If you’ve ever had to make a tough choice between two shoes, chances are that you’ve come across the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 22 and the Brooks Glycerin 20. Both shoes offer great cushioning, flexibility, and breathability, so it’s not surprising that it’s hard to decide between these two popular models. Here’s a comparison of the two shoes so you can make an informed decision.
The Adrenaline GTS 22 has a redesigned GuideRails support system, making it more supportive than ever. The shoe is designed with full-length BioMoGo cushioning that is engineered to reduce pressure in the foot. The GTS 22 also features a sophisticated upper construction that is both soft and lightweight, providing flexible support in a fluid, natural motion. A GuideRails Holistic Support System is used to provide structure, reducing unnecessary instability.
On the other hand, the Glycerin 20 features their Super DNA cushioning for superior comfort. Its 3D Fit Print upper offers an adaptive stretch fit, while the FitKnit material offers a breathable and comfortable wrap. Additionally, the Glycerin is designed with a full-length Segmented Crash Pad to provide optimal shock absorbance and a smooth heel-to-toe transition. The shoe also features an integrated mid-foot saddle, giving a secure fit.
Since both shoes are designed to be used for various activities and sports, the main difference between the two lies in the construction. The Adrenaline GTS 22 offers support, comfort, and more flexibility to help with a natural running motion. The Glycerin 20, on the other hand, offers more cushioning and a wider fit. Therefore, both shoes are focused on different types of needs and preferences.
In summary, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 22 and the Brooks Glycerin 20 are both excellent shoes with different features, making it impossible to say which one is the better option. However, each shoe offers something different that will appeal to different types of runners. It is up to the individual runner to decide which shoe best suits their needs.